I've been going through the "Photography - Artistic Nude" section and I must say I'm disgusted at what some consider to have artistic merit... photos that have no apperant artisitic meaning that more often than naught look like porn, this has left me quite disillusioned as to what the DA staff will let through and what they won't.

This is no way a rant about how my own work was wrongly pulled from this site on a few occasions (I enjoy being "controversial") it is a statement, nay a question as to how someone can post work of a phallus so close to their partners mouth as to express on the onset of felatio or how someone can stand there pulling on his phallus to extend it while guzzling a cheap american beer and even a close-up of a womens exposed and "massaged" clitoris can be allowed to remain posted?

Not more than five minutes ago I ran across several photos that fall more into the classes of trash or porn than they do art... my question to you DA staff is when are you going to wake up and learn the sutble differences and even the blatant ones 'tween art and trash/porn.

"This is what you get when you put your faith in others."